<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Volvoapedia.org &#187; op-ed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.volvoapedia.org/tag/op-ed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.volvoapedia.org</link>
	<description>Volvoapedia.org &#124; Volvo News, Reviews, Pictures &#38; Video</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:28:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bring Back Our Boxy Volvo Cars! (Op-Ed)</title>
		<link>http://www.volvoapedia.org/bring-back-our-boxy-volvo-cars-op-ed</link>
		<comments>http://www.volvoapedia.org/bring-back-our-boxy-volvo-cars-op-ed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automotive news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boxy volvo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volvo 880]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volvo pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.volvoapedia.org/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this age of round, tiny, aero-dynamic autos I would find it refreshing to see a large square rolling down the street, with a smokey, guzzling V8 under its hood. Rolling Iron. The Volvo cars of yesterday are a far cry from Green Rides everyone is producing in this year of our lord Two-Thousand &#38; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-147" title="Volvo240-7" src="http://www.volvoapedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Volvo240-7.jpg" alt="Volvo240-7" width="565" height="283" /></p>
<p>In this age of round, tiny, aero-dynamic autos I would find it refreshing to see a large square rolling down the street, with a smokey, guzzling V8 under its hood. Rolling Iron.<span id="more-145"></span> The Volvo cars of yesterday are a far cry from Green Rides everyone is producing in this year of our lord Two-Thousand &amp; Nine. Even as Volvo struggles, along with pretty much every other foreign and domestic car maker on Earth, it might be a refreshing take on the automobile to bring a little nostalgic-styling back to dealership lots.</p>
<p><center><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-148" title="boxy-volvo" src="http://www.volvoapedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/boxy-volvo.jpg" alt="boxy-volvo" width="411" height="500" /></center></p>
<p>You could still produce the 4-cyl Compacts, maybe even make a Ford Focus type ride (as Ford owns a large stake in Volvo) but keep that classic late-70&#8242;s to mid-80&#8242;s 90 degree angled look. How about a hybrid that looks like a Lego car? Volvo could pull it off. Wouldn&#8217;t be too much of a departure from their current lineup &#8211; even without the sharp corners Volvo is still making some of the boxiest automobiles on the road today.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-149" title="Volvo144dl" src="http://www.volvoapedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Volvo144dl.JPG" alt="Volvo144dl" width="565" height="308" /></p>
<p>Come on people &#8211; today, our cars look like Japanese imports&#8230;tomorrow, the terrorists win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.volvoapedia.org/bring-back-our-boxy-volvo-cars-op-ed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

